Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
ARMAN KHAN vs UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK on 16 July 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**ORDER-SHEET** Page No. ....
**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN**
**M.A. No. 48 of 2026 Arman Khan Vs Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank**
**Date: 16.07.2026**
Item No.04
Present: Sh. Brij Bhushan, Ld. Counsel for Applicant. Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for Respondent Bank Called out, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent bank present through video conferencing. Ld. Counsel for the applicant with applicant in person present physically.
The securitization filed by the applicant was dismissed on 28.04.2026 in absence of the applicant as no compliance has been made by the applicant of order dated 20.02.2026 mentioned in the order dated 28.04.2026.
Today applicant has stated that he wants to settle the matter with the bank, there is no any provision for issuing direction to the secured creditor by the Tribunal for settlement, if the applicant wants to settle the account may approach directly to the Respondent bank.
In the light of statement made by the applicant orally before the Tribunal in relation to which no relief can be granted by the Tribunal there is no need to proceed further this petition and the petition ~~liable~~ to be disposed off. Hence, the petition disposed off.
All interim applications are also disposed off.
Record be consigned.
(Umesh Kumar Sharma) Presiding Officer DRT, Dehradun
16.07.2026