Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

MR GURDAYAL SINGH & ORS. vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**ORDER-SHEET** Page No. ....

**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN**

**M.A. No. 74 of 2026**

**Mr. Gurdayal Singh & Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.**

**Date: 15.10.2026**

Item No.06

Present: Sh. Anees, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant (through VC) Sh. N. K. Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for respondent bank (through VC)

Called out, Ld. Counsel for the Applicants present.

The applicant has not filed miscellaneous application in appropriate manner. The Applicant is directed to file miscellaneous application in accordance with law, if want to file. This miscellaneous Application, in present form is not maintainable, as no details of party is mentioned, only stated at the head of Application Mr. Gurdayal singh & Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

Every litigant is duty bound to file any petition/application/original suit etc in appropriate manner in absence of details of any party it is not possible to the Tribunal, issuance of notice on the basis of this miscellaneous application.

If applicant want to proceed further shall take appropriate step in appropriate manner.

Mr. Gurdayal Singh has not come forward to file this petition, the petition is signed by Mohd. Yaseen and the Vakalatnama has also been filed by Mohd. Yaseen in personal capacity, not in the capacity of attorney even though Ld. Counsel for the Applicant has stated that Mr. Yaseen is special attorney of Mr. Gurdayal Singh.

In the light of above, this petition is not maintainable and liable to be rejected in limine with the condition if Mr. Gurdayal Singh want to file miscellaneous application should be filed in appropriate manner, as this petition has shown that Mr. Yaseen has filed this petition in personal capacity for which he is not entitled.

Hence, this miscellaneous is rejected accordingly.

15.10.2026 (Umesh Kumār Sharma) Presiding Officer DRT, Dehradun

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead