Armed Forces Tribunal

Manoj Kumar vs Union of India on 21 October 2026

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH

AT CHANDIMANDIR

-.-

OA 342 of 2026

Wednesday, the 21st day of Oct, 2026

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL, MEMBER (J)

HON'BLE LT GEN (DR) RANBIR SINGH, MEMBER (A)

Manoj Kumar

…… Applicant

(By SC Patwa, Advocate)

Versus

Union of India and others

…… Respondents

(By Vivek Sharma, Sr PC)

-.-

ORDER

Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon Rule 7 of the Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards to Armed Forces Personnel, 2008, to submit that by merely relying upon Para 4 of Guide to Medical Officers (Military Pensions)-2008, the respondents have not discharged the onus placed upon them to show that the disability was neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service.

Notice.

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Sr PC, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and waives service and seeks time to file reply.

Adjourned to 07.04.2027.

(Lt Gen (Dr) Ranbir Singh)

(Justice Sudhir Mittal) Member (A)

Member (J)

21st Oct, 2026 AKB

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead