Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
SRIJAN HOSPITAL vs BANK OF BARODA on 14 October 2026
**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**
(Holding Additional Charge of DRAT, Allahabad)
Diary No. 2077/2026 (Misc Appeal)
Arising out of S.A. No. 33/2026 (DRT, Allahabad)
Item No.02
Srijan Hospital
V.
Bank of Baroda
14.10.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain Present: Sh. Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for appellant / applicant through VC
Sh. Maneesh Mehrotra, Advocate for respondent bank through VC
This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.
L.A. No. 1589/2026 (application for urgent hearing)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 1. The instant application is filed for urgent hearing of the present appeal which is otherwise listed on 29.10.2026 on the ground that the respondent FI is scheduled to take the possession of the subject property on 15.10.2026.
2. 2. The Counsel for the appellant / applicant referred the order dated 14.10.2026 passed by DRT-Allahabad whereby the appellant / applicant was directed to file an application before this Tribunal in case of urgent relief is required. The Counsel for the appellant / applicant stated that there was no diversion of fund from raising the hospital to raise the hotel as alleged by the respondent FI. It is also stated that the appellant / applicant only raised the building not a hotel as alleged by the Counsel for the respondent FI and it was due to the reason that there was not necessary sanction by the competent authority of the respondent FI to raise the hospital. He prayed that the interim order be granted in favour of the appellant / applicant.
3. 3. The Counsel for respondent no.1 stated that the appellant / applicant misused the loan sanctioned by the respondent FI by raising a hotel in place of hospital and due to this reason the loan has already been recalled. He further stated that the appellant / applicant have also filed two Writ Petitions before the Allahabad High Court which have been dismissed.
4. After considering all facts there is no ground made out for taking the appeal on urgent basis. Hence, the application is dismissed.
5. List on 29.10.2026, date already fixed.
---
(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain) Chairperson Addl. Charge, DRAT, Allahabad
-N