Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Eliyaas Son of Rahim vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 16 September 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):160/2025
Eliyaas V/S State Bank Of India
16/09/2026
Learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank are present. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the respondent-Bank has taken physical possession of the secured asset and therefore, this appeal has become infructuous. The appellant is seeking refund of pre-deposit amount . The memo filed to the effect that the appeal is withdrawn by the appellant is recorded. In view of the memo filed, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount deposited towards pre-deposit, with accrued interest, if any, is ordered to be refunded to the appellant. Parties shall bear their own costs. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-
Chairperson