Central Administrative Tribunal

Ghimu Ram Jaryal Alias Ghimy Ram Jaryal vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan on 30 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1- O.A. No. 063/01283/2021

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CHANDIGARH BENCH

Hearing by Video Conferencing

Original Application No.063/01283/2021

Chandigarh, this the 30th of December 2021

HON’BLE SH. SURESH KUMAR MONGA, MEMBER (J)

(Through video conference from Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench)

Ghimu Ram Jaryal @ Ghimy Ram Jaryal aged about 54 years son of Sh. Meen Ram R/o Village Lalera P.O. Bandhlu Tehsil and Distt. Chamba (Himachal Pradesh) Pin 176311 Employee Code 33819, present KV Code 1662 (Group B)

....Applicant

(BY: Sh. Sanjeev Patiyal, Advocate)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

2. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18, Institutional Area, Shahid Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi – 110016 through its Commissioner/Chairman.

3. Joint Commissioner (Admn.), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18, Institutional Area, Shahid Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi – 110016.

4. Sujeeta Kumari PGT Economics K.V. Bakloh Distt. Champa HP- 176301 (Grade B) ... .Respondents (BY: Sh. Sanjay Goyal, Advocate for R-1 Sh. R.K. Sharma for R-2 and 3)

O R D E R(Oral)

Per: SURESH KUMAR MONGA, MEMBER (J):

1. At the very outset, Sh. R.K. Sharma, learned counsel for Respondents No. 2 and 3 stated that the applicant’s 2- O.A. No. 063/01283/2021

representation dated 29.10.2021 (Annexure A-4) is under active consideration of the respondents and, therefore, the present Original Application may be disposed of by granting leave to respondents to dispose of the said representation.

2. In view of the above statement made by Sh. R.K. Sharma, learned counsel for Respondents No. 2 and 3, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the present Original Application at the admission stage itself without entering into the merits of the case.

3. Accordingly, the Original Application is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ) New Delhi to decide the applicant’s representation dated 29.10.2021 and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. Before taking such a decision, the applicant shall also be afforded an opportunity of hearing. The whole exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

4. Ordered accordingly. However, there shall be no orders so as to costs.

(SURESH KUMAR MONGA)

MEMBER (J) ‘mw’

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead