Central Administrative Tribunal

Dr Anil Sehajpal vs M/o Agriculture on 30 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

![Logo of the Central Administrative Tribunal, featuring a wheel with spokes and the text 'Central Administrative Tribunal' and 'सत्यमेव जयते' (Satyameva Jayate) in Devanagari script.](e4f7db458f400c21b9729ae18e0861db_2_img.webp)

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CHANDIGARH BENCH

O.A.NO.060/01042/2020

Decided on: 30.12.2020

**HON'BLE MS. AJANTA DAYALAN, MEMBER (A)**

Dr. Anil Sehajpal son of Shri Raj Kumar Sehajpal, aged 55 years, working as PPO (Chem), Regional Pesticides Testing laboratory, Bays No. 43-44-45, Sector 31-A, Chandigarh-160030 (now under transfer to RPTL, Kanpur) (Group-B).

....

Applicant

**(BY ADVOCATE: MR. ROHIT SHARMA)**

VERSUS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. 1. Union of India through the Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare, Old CGO Complex, NH-IV, Faridabad, Haryana-121001.

2. 2. Plant Protection Adviser, Directorate of Plant Protection Quarantine & Storage Old CGO Complex, NH-IV Faridabad, Haryana-121001.

Respondents

**(BY ADVOCATE: MR. SANJAY GOYAL)**

![Seal of the Central Administrative Tribunal, featuring a wheel with spokes and the motto 'सत्यमेव जयते' (Satyameva Jayate) in Devanagari script.](0b26d50342e807439193072cd197a939_3_img.webp)

**O R D E R (ORAL)** **HON'BLE MS. AJANTA DAYALAN, MEMBER (A)**

1. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

2. 2. Issue notice.

3. 3. Mr. Sanjay Goyal, Senior Central Govt. Standing Counsel for Union of India, present via Video Conferencing, accepts notice.

4. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant states that he will be satisfied if representation dated 11.8.2020 (Annexure A-8) followed by reminder dated 28.8.2020 (Annexure A-9) submitted by applicant for his promotion to the post of Assistant Director (Chemistry) is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

5. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

6. 6. In view of the above, it is directed that competent authority amongst the respondents may consider and take a decision on the representation dated 11.8.2020 (Annexure A-8) followed by reminder dated 28.8.2020 (Annexure A-9) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Order so passed be duly communicated to the applicant.

7. 7. Needless to mention that disposal of the O.A. in the above manner may not be construed as an expression of any opinion or view on the merits of the case.

8. 8. No order as to costs.

**(AJANTA DAYALAN)** **MEMBER (A)**

Place: Chandigarh Dated: 30.12.2020

HC\*

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead