Central Administrative Tribunal
Sunil Kumar vs CAG on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH Order Sheet Item no.: 8 O.A./1297/2026 (CHANDIGARH) [ OLD PENSION SCHEME ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 15/10/2026 SUNIL KUMAR Vs CAG
For Applicant(s) Advocate : SH. JAGDEEP JASWAL AND SH. SANJEEV BHUDHIRAJA
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal MA 3283/2026 This application has been filed by applicants seeking permission of this Tribunal to prosecute the OA jointly on the ground that their cause of action and relief claimed are same. MA is allowed for the reasons stated therein. All the applicants are permitted to prosecute the OA jointly. OA Heard learned counsel for applicants. Issue notice to respondents. Sh. Barjesh Mittal, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Service is dispensed with. The applicant has placed reliance on various judicial pronouncements passed by this Tribunal including Annexure A-1, against the same department i.e. CAG.
One opportunity is granted to respondents to show cause as to why the dictum of Annexure A-1 be not applicable in the instant case. List before Joint Registrar on 30.11.2026. Suresh Kumar Batra Member (J) Dinky Bansal ( steno 'd' )