Central Administrative Tribunal
DR PRASAD C G S vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 13 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.170/00015/2026
DATED THIS THE DAY OF 13TH OCTOBER, 2026
CORAM:
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE DR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
DR. PRASAD C G S
S/o C S Girivas,
Aged about 57 years,
Working as Medical Superintendent
ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR
and Model Hospital Rajajinagar,
Bengaluru – 560010
R/o 713, 3rd Block, Sir M V Layout.
Ullalu Upanagara, Bangalore – 560110
…Applicant
(By Advocate, Smt Akkamahadevi Hiremath)
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Employees State Insurance Corporation, Hqrs. Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, CIG Marg, New Delhi – 110002, Represented by its Director General
2. The Medical Commissioner (M.A), Hqrs. Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, CIG Marg, New Delhi – 110002 CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA
3. The ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR Model Hospital, Rajajinagar, Bangalore – 560010 Represented by its Dean
4. The ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR Model Hospital and ODC (EZ) Diamond Harbour Road, Joka Kolkata, West Bengal 700104 Represented by its dean
…Respondents
(By Advocate, Shri N Amaresh)
O R D E R (ORAL) PER: MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
This Original Application is filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following reliefs: “(i). To set aside the Suspension Order dated 15-12- 2025 in No.C/27/2025-O/o AC (VIG) HQ, passed by the Respondent No 2 herein, produced as ANNEXURE A1, and ;
(ii) To direct the respondents to consider the representation submitted dated 25/12/2025 by the applicant produced herewith as ANNEXURE A5, and CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA
(iii) .Grant any such relief, as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel Smt. Akkamahadevi Hiremath representing the applicant has filed a memo along with a copy of the Order dated 15.09.2026 whereby revocation of suspension of the applicant has been ordered w.e.f. 11.09.2026.
3. The same is taken on record.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel appearing for both the parties submit that OA has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, OA stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
(DR. SANJIV KUMAR) (JUSTICE S. SUJATHA) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
/cv/
CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA