Central Administrative Tribunal
Dr PADMAVATHY M vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 13 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.170/00013/2026
DATED THIS THE DAY OF 13th OCTOBER, 2026
CORAM:
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE DR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
Dr. Padmavathy M
W/o A. C. Jayaram,
Aged about 53 years,
Working as Specialist Gr- I at
ESIC Hospital Peenya,
Bengaluru - 560022
R/o No. 721/1, Padmashree Nilaya,
11th Cross, MES road,
Muthyalanagar, Bengaluru 560054 …Applicant (By Advocate, Smt. Akkamahadevi Hiremath)
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Employees State Insurance Corporation, Hqrs. Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, C.I.G Marg, New Delhi-110002, Represented by its Director General,
2. The Medical Commissioner (M. A) Hqrs. Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, C.I.G Marg, New Delhi-1100023.
3. The Medical Superintendent, ESIC Hospital, Peenya, Bangalore-560022
4. The Employees State Insurance Corporation Medical College, Gulbarga, Sedam Road, CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA
Kalaburgi - 585106 Represented by its dean …Respondents
(By Advocate, Shri N. Amaresh)
O R D E R (ORAL) PER: MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
This Original Application is filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following reliefs: “(i) To set aside the Suspension Order dated 15-12- 2025 in No. C/27/2025-O/o AC (VIG)HQ, passed by the Respondent No 2 herein, produced as ANNEXURE A1, and;
(ii) To direct the respondents to consider the representation submitted dated 25/12/2025 by the applicant produced herewith as ANNEXURE A7.
(iii) Grant any such relief, as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, and in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel Smt. Akkamahadevi Hiremath representing the applicant has filed a memo along with a copy of the Order dated 15.09.2026 whereby revocation of suspension of the applicant has been ordered w.e.f. 11.09.2026.
3. The same is taken on record.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel appearing for both CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA
the parties submit that OA has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, OA stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/- (DR. SANJIV KUMAR) (JUSTICE S.SUJATHA) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
/cv/
CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA