Central Administrative Tribunal
MURALI KRISHNA BURELA vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 13 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.170/00056/2026
DATED THIS THE DAY OF 13TH OCTOBER, 2026
CORAM:
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE DR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
Murali Krishna Burela
S/o Satyanarayana,
Aged about 38 years,
Working as Senior Pharmacist (NFG)
at ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR
and Model Hospital Rajajinagar,
Bengaluru – 560010
R/o H.No.454, 40th Cross,
2nd Block, Rajajinagar,
Bengaluru - 560010
…Applicant
(By Advocate, Smt Akkamahadevi Hiremath)
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Employees State Insurance Corporation, Hqrs. Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, CIG Marg, New Delhi – 110002, Represented by its Director General
CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA
2. The Medical Commissioner (M.A), Hqrs. Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, CIG Marg, New Delhi – 110002
3. The Medial Superintendent, ESIC, MC PGIMSR & Medical Hospital, Rajajinagar, Bangalore – 560010
4. The ESIC Dispensary cum Branch Office, I floor, Vishwanath Apartments, Kaikini Road, Karwar 581301 Represented by its Medical Officer
5. Regional Director and Disciplinary Authority ESI Corporation, Regional Office (Karnataka) No.10, Binnypet, Binny Fields, Next to ETA Mall, Bangalore – 560023 …Respondents
(By Advocate, Shri Siddaveer Chakki)
O R D E R (ORAL) PER: MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
This Original Application is filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following reliefs: “(i). To set aside the Suspension Order dated 16-12-2025 in No.53.KAR.RD. VIG.ESICMH.RNR.2025, suspending the Applicant and passed by the Respondent No 5 herein, produced as ANNEXURE A1, and ;
(ii) .Grant any such relief, as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA
2. Learned counsel Smt. Akkamahadevi Hiremath representing the applicant has filed a memo along with a copy of the Order dated 15.09.2026 whereby revocation of suspension of the applicant has been ordered w.e.f. 11.09.2026.
3. The same is taken on record.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel appearing for both the parties submit that OA has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, OA stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
(DR. SANJIV KUMAR) (JUSTICE S. SUJATHA) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
/cv/
CHHAYA VERMA
CHHAY A VERMA