Central Administrative Tribunal

NAGARAJ G ANVERI vs REVENUE on 28 December 2023

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.170/00308/2023

DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

CORAM:

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)

Nagaraj G Anveri,

S/o Shri. G.V Anveri

Aged about 54 years,

Working as Superintendent of Customs,

Bangalore City Customs,

Bangalore – 560 001.

.... Applicant

(By Shri. BS Venkatesh Kumar, Advocate – through video conference)

Vs.

1. Union of India represented by Revenue Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi - 110001.

2. The Secretary, Department of Expenditure, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

3. The Chairman, Central Board of Indirect Taxes North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

Page 1 of 2

4. The Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru, P.B No.5400, Central Revenue Building, Queen’s Road, Bangalore – 560 001.

.…Respondents

(By Shri. Sayed S Kazi, Addl. Central Government Standing Counsel)

O R D E R (ORAL)

PER: JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)

Though the matter was listed “For Orders” today, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter has been taken up for final disposal.

2. The applicant has sought for the following reliefs: “(a) Call for records of the case from the respondents and on perusal (b) Issue a direction to the respondents to grant Non- Functional Grade (NFG) scale in the pay band 2 – Rs.8300- 34800 +GP Rs.5400 after completion of four years’ service to the applicant from the date of grant of GP of Rs.4800 by fixing his pay with a further direction to grant all consequential financial benefits of arrears.

(c) Grant such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper to grant to the applicant including an order as to costs of this OA for unnecessarily thrusting this litigation on the applicant, in the interests of justice.”

3. The issue involved herein is no more res integra in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.8883 of 2011 dated 10.10.2017 and Review Petition (Civil) No.2512 of 2018

dated 23.08.2018 (Union of India v/s M. Subramaniam) consistently followed by this Tribunal.

4. In view of the aforesaid, this Original Application stands disposed of, in similar terms. No order as to costs.

(RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA) (JUSTICE S. SUJATHA)

MEMBER (A)

MEMBER (J) /rk/

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead