Central Administrative Tribunal
D V KAVITHA vs BSNL AND OTHERS on 9 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 8 M.A./360/2026 (BANGALORE) [ FOR AMENDMENT ] In O.A./301/2026 TRANSFER M.A./345/2026 M.A./368/2026 Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 09/10/2026 D V KAVITHA Vs BSNL AND OTHERS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Party-in-person For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri S Prakash Shetty for Respondent No. 1, Shri K. Gajendra Vasu for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 Order of The Tribunal
Party-in-person, Smt. D V Kavitha appears on behalf of the applicant. Shri S Prakash Shetty appears on behalf of respondent no. 1. Shri K. Gajendra Vasu appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 5. On the last occasion, the party in person was requested to cure the defects in the MA regarding amendment of OA. The same has been carried out. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that he would like to file his objections to the MA 360/2026 filed for amendment of the OA. Heard on MA No. 345/2026 filed by the respondents for filing additional reply. The MA is allowed and the additional reply is taken on record.
Heard on MA No. 368/2026 filed by applicant to file additional rejoinder. The MA is allowed and the additional rejoinder is also taken on record. The learned counsel for the respondents is permitted to file MA for his additional reply along with the objections to the amended OA. It is brought to my notice that hard copy of this additional rejoinder has not been served upon the learned counsel for the respondents. The applicant may serve a har copy of the same to the learned counsel for the respondents. It is also brought to my notice by the applicant that hard copies of the reply and the additional reply have not been served upon her. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they were given to her earlier counsel who is no more representing her case. Hence, he is also requested to serve the copies of the reply and the additonal reply to the party in person. List the case on 27.10.2026.
SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A) Komal Rani ( steno 'c' )