Central Administrative Tribunal

V R Venkatesan vs M/O DEFENCE on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 15 O.A./265/2025 (BANGALORE) [ PAY FIXATION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 13 Order Dated: 08/10/2026 V R VENKATESAN Vs M/O DEFENCE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri N G Phadke For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri S. Sugumaran Order of The Tribunal MA No. 355/2026 (for additional reply): Heard. Additional reply is taken on record. MA No. 355/2026 is allowed. OA No. 265/2025: Learned counsel Shri N G Phadke representing the applicant submits that the additional rejoinder has been filed persuant to the additional reply filed the respondents. However, the same is not accompanied with the MA, and hence seeks time to file the necessary MA. List the matter on 02.11.2026 as prayed.

Dr Sanjiv Kumar Member (A) Justice S Sujatha Member (J)

Chhaya Verma ( steno 'd' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead