Central Administrative Tribunal
Pukhraj Garg vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS on 12 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR Order Sheet Item no.: 7 O.A./82/2026 (JODHPUR) [ VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 4 Order Dated: 12/10/2026 PUKHRAJ GARG Vs DEPARTMENT OF POSTS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr Anirudh Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr K.S.Yadav Order of The Tribunal Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that he has submitted his willingness for voluntary retirement under Rule 43 of the CCA Rules, 1965. He further submits that there is no vigilance/departmental/criminal proceedings pending before any of the authority. Therefore, his voluntary retirement should have been accepted. Learned Counsel for the respondents sought time to file reply. Request accepted. Reply be filed within two weeks. Put up on 04.11.2026. HUKUM SINGH MEENA Member (A) Sourabh Jain ( steno 'd' )