Central Administrative Tribunal
Dr Dakshika Lochan vs LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT (MS) on 6 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR Order Sheet Item no.: 4 O.A./248/2026 (JODHPUR) [ TERMINATION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 06/10/2026 DR DAKSHIKA LOCHAN Vs LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT (MS)
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Mukul Krishna Vyas For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Akshat Verma Order of The Tribunal On receipt of an advance copy of the OA, Mr. Akshat Verma appears on behalf of the respondents. Heard. Counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned notice dated 10.09.2026(Annexure-A/1) i.e. an advance one month notice to terminate the service of the applicant, has been passed by respondent No.5 Medical Superintendent, ESIC hospital, Bikaner, on the complaint lodged by his wife i.e. respondent No.6, Head of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology hospital. He further submits that the order is stigmatic in nature against which he has already filed representation(Annexure-A/10) dated 12.09.2026, to Director General ESIC New-Delhi, which is still pending for consideration. In view of the above, issue notice to respondents, returnable on 27.10.2026.
List the matter on 27.10.2026. Meanwhile, respondent No. 2, Director General ESIC, is at liberty to decide the representation of the applicant according to rules. Till the decision on the representation, the effect and operation of the impugned notice(Annexure-A/1) dated 10.09.2026 shall be remain stayed.
Rameshwar Vyas Member (J) Rajendra Choudhary ( court master )