Central Administrative Tribunal

INDU KUMARI vs DEPTT OF POSTS on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

-1- OA/050/00711/2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

PATNA BENCH,PATNA

OA/050/00711/2026

With

MA/050/00595/2026

Date of Order: 16.10.2026

C O R A M

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER (A)

1. Indu Kumari W/o Bijay Kumar

2. Alaka Sharma, D/o Pramod Kumar

Both are resident of village & PO-Mahsoura, District- Lakhisarai-

811107.

……..Applicants.

- By Advocate(s): - Shri S.K. Tiwary

-Versus-

1. The Union of India through the Secretary-cum-D.G., Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

2. The Chief Postmaster General, Department of Posts, Bihar Circle, Patna-800001.

3. The Assistant Director (Staff & Recruitment), Department of Posts, O/o the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna-800001.

4. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Nawada Division, Nawada.

…….Respondents.

By Advocate(s) :- Shri Bhuneshwsar Pandey, Addl. Standing Counsel

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

[ORAL] Per Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, J.M.:- Shri S.K. Tiwary, learned counsel for the applicants is present. Shri Bhuneshwar Pandey, ld. Addl. Standing Counsel on receipt of advance copy of O.A. has appeared for the opposite parties.

KABI SURYAR OOP KABI

-2- OA/050/00711/2026

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants.

3. MA No. 595/2026 filed by the applicants (two in number) to pursue the matter jointly is allowed since the cause of action, grievances and the reliefs sought are same.

4. Counsel for the applicants has submitted that applicant no. 1 is working as GDSBPM in the Nawada Postal Division. She submitted representation on 12.09.2025 for retirement on medical ground and as per rule she requested to the respondent no. 4 for appointment of her daughter-in-law (applicant no. 2) on compassionate ground. Thereafter, the applicant no. 1 was discharged from engagement on medical ground. Despite the request of applicant no. 1, the applicant no. 2 has not got appointment on compassionate grounds. Counsel for the applicants has further submitted that applicant no. 2 submitted all the relevant documents for appointment on compassionate ground in the office of respondent no. 4. Thereafter, the respondent no. 4 downloaded the documents under online process for appointment of applicant no. 2 on compassionate ground in the month of March, 2026. The application of the applicant no. 2 is also registered vide Registration No. 60056847. Counsel for the applicants has further submitted that applicant no. 1 has given a representation dated 13.05.2026 (Annexure-A/8) to the Opposite party No. 4/competent authority for consideration of case of appointment of applicant no. 2 on compassionate grounds but still it has not been decided. He further submitted that applicants are hopeful that if the representation of applicant no. 1 is considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance with the law/rules, their grievance at this stage shall be redressed. Accordingly, this OA may be disposed of with direction to the opposite parties/competent authority to consider and decide the

KABI SURYAR OOP KABI

-3- OA/050/00711/2026

said pending representation as per rule/law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a specific time frame.

5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties raised no objection to the submission of counsel for applicant.

6. However, by considering the innocuous prayer of the applicants for disposal of representation of applicant no. 1 in accordance with law and rules, the present OA is disposed of, without entering into the merit of the case, with direction to the Opposite Party No. 4/competent authority to consider and decide the representation of the applicant no. 1 dated 13.05.2026 (Annexure-A/8) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

6. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kumar Johari) Member (A) Member(J) Srk.

KABI SURYAR OOP KABI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead