Central Administrative Tribunal
MrRuqaiya Khatoon alias Roquaiya Khatoon vs CIP on 6 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH, PATNA
O.A. No. 051/00436/2026
Date of order:-06.10.2026
C O R A M
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J]
HON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER [A]
Ms. Ruqaiya Khatoon @ Roqaiya Khatoon, age about 39 years w/o Md. Abul Bakar, r/o kanke Patra Toli, P.O-Ranchi Veterinary college, P.S-Kanke, District-Ranchi, presently working as Safaiwali, CIP, Kanke, Ranchi Mobile No.7208913477
E-mail ID:ruqaiya151@gmail.com
………Applicant
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through, The secretary, Ministry of Health & Family welfare, New Delhi-100001
2. Director & Medical Superintendent, Central Institute of Psychiatry, (CIP) Kanke, P.S:-Kanke, District:-Ranchi-834008
3. The Disciplinary Authority, Central Institute of Psychiatry (CIP), Kanke, P.S:-Kanke, District:-Ranchi-834008 ……Opposite Parties For Applicant:- Mr. Anis Khan, Advocate For Opposite Parties:- Mr. Amit Sinha, ASC
O R D E R (Oral) Per:- JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J]
1. Counsels for both the sides are present.
2. At the very outset, counsel for applicant has submitted that applicant was suspended on 14.12.2023 which was subsequently revoked on 15.01.2025. Applicant is a poor lady and she is performing Digitally signed by DURGESH UTTAM DURGE SH UTTAM
the job as a sweeper and due to continuing of disciplinary proceeding, she is facing a great mental agony and pain.
3. Counsel for applicant further submitted that enquiry report has already been submitted on 22.04.2026, hence, the purpose of the O.A. shall be satisfied at this stage, if the authority concerned be directed to take a decision upon enquiry report and decide the disciplinary enquiry, by considering the report of enquiry officer dt. 22.04.2026 by way of speaking and reasoned order, within a stipulated time.
4. Counsel for opposite party has not made any objection on the innocuous prayer of applicant.
5. We have heard the contention of counsel for applicant and considered the request.
6. In view of above submission, opposite party no. 3/ competent authority is directed to conclude the disciplinary proceeding by considering the report of enquiry officer by a reasoned and speaking order within 60 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
7. It is also directed to the applicant that she will co-operate with the authority concerned in conclusion of the enquiry.
8. Accordingly, the O.A. is disposed of without considering the case on the merit.
9. No order as to costs.
(Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kumar Johari)
Member (A) Member (J) du/-
Digitally signed by DURGESH UTTAM DURGE SH UTTAM