Central Administrative Tribunal
Kumari madhuri pradhan vs SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY on 6 October 2026
1 CP N0. 80/2026 (R)
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH, PATNA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT RANCHI
CP/051/00080/2026
(Arising out of O.A. No.051/00674/2024
Order dated: 06.10.2026.
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER (J)
HON’LE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER (A)
Kumari Madhuri Pradhan, aged about aged about 36 years, daughter of Late Pradeep Kumar Pradhan, Ex-Tech. Gr. II, Electric General in the office of Electric General Office, CKP Division, S.E. Railway, P.O. & P.S.- Chakradharpur, Dist. Singhbhum (West) PIN-833102.
……..Petitioner.
- By Advocate(s): - Mrs. M.M. Pal, ld. Sr. Advocate.
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Anil Kumar Jain, son of not known to the petitioner, the General Manager, S.E. Railway, Garden Reach, P.O. & P.S-Garden Reach, Kolkata-700043.
2. Mr. Tarun Kumar Huria, the Divisional Railway Manager, S.E. Railway, Chakradharpur Division, P.O. & P.S. Chakradharpur Division, District-West Singhbhum, PIN - 833102.
3. Mr. Prakash Kumar, the Welfare Inspector, CKP Division, P.O. & P.S. Chakradharpur, District-West Singhbhum, PIN - 833102.
…….Respondents.
By Advocate(s): - None.
O R D E R (ORAL)
Per:Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, Member (J)
1. Counsel for the petitioner is present.
2. At the very outset, counsel for the petitioner submitted that she intends to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to file the petition under Section 27 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. Digitally signed by BINAY PRASAD BINAY PRASA D
2 CP N0. 80/2026 (R)
3. We have heard and considered the prayer of the counsel for the petitioner.
4. In view of the above submissions of counsel for the petitioner, the C.P. is dropped/dismissed as withdrawn without issuing any show cause notice with aforesaid liberty. . (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kumar Johari) Member (A) Member(J) BP.
Digitally signed by BINAY PRASAD BINAY PRASA D