Central Administrative Tribunal
VINAY KUMAR PASWAN vs EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 5 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH, PATNA
O.A. No. 051/00521/2026
Date of order:-05.10.2026
C O R A M
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J]
HON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER [A]
Vinay Kumar Paswan, aged about 37 years, son of Late Ramjeet Ram, resident of Barwadih Railway Quarter, Barwadih, PO & PS:
Barwadih, District- Latehar- 822 111, Mobile No.: 7667219772, E-Mail id:- virajvinay8434@gmail.com
………Applicant
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur, PO & PS: Hazipur, District-Vaishali (Bihar)- 844 101
2. Senior Divisional Signal & telecom Engineer (Coordinator), East Central Railway, Dhanbad, PO & PS: Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad- 826 001
3. Divisional Signal and Telecom Engineer, East central Railway, Dhanbad, PO & PS: Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad-826 001 ……Opposite Parties For Applicant:- Shri A.K. Sahani, Advocate For Opposite Parties:- Shri Ranesh Anand, SPC
O R D E R (Oral) Per:- JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER [J]
1. Counsels for both the sides are present.
2. At the very outset, counsel for applicant has submitted that against the order of the Disciplinary Authority dt. 14.11.2024 which was for Digitally signed by DURGESH UTTAM DURGE SH UTTAM
removal of the applicant from service, the applicant has filed an appeal before the opposite party no. 2 who is the Appellate Authority on 04.12.2024. The appeal is still pending.
3. Since the applicant has been removed from service, an unnecessary delay in disposal of appeal is causing a great mental agony, therefore, he requested that the purpose of the O.A shall be satisfied at this stage, if the opposite party be directed to consider and decide the above appeal by way of speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law/ rule, within a stipulated time. Applicant is hopeful that if his appeal is decided accordingly, his grievances may be redressed.
4. Counsel for opposite party has not made any objection as the innocuous prayer of applicant.
5. We have heard the contention of counsel for applicant and considered the request.
6. In view of above submission, opposite party no. 2/ competent authority is directed to decide the appeal which has been filed by the applicant on 04.12.2024 by a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law/ rule within 90 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, the O.A. is disposed of without considering the case on the merit.
8. M.A. No. 413 of 2026 also stands disposed of.
9. No order as to costs.
(Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kumar Johari)
Member (A) Member (J) du/-
Digitally signed by DURGESH UTTAM DURGE SH UTTAM