MS AMAR TECHNOCRAFT through, ITS PROPRITER MR. AMARJEET SINGH BAKSHISINGH SHAHI vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED on 28 September 2026

Sr. No. 34 FARAD DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - MUMBAI DrARY NO. 1323 OF 2026 (REGULAR APPEAL) Date 28.09.2026 ROZNAMA -l'he learned Advocate for the Appellant filed a praecipe before the Leamed Registrar on 25.09.2026. However, when the matter was listed today before the Learned Registrar on the Board, none appeared on behalf of the Appellant. All office objections stand complied with except the objection regarding requisite court fee. Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that considerable amount has already been paid before the learned DRT, Aurangabad, pursuant to its order and, therefbre, computation ot' court 1'ee on the basis of the original demand notice may require reconsideration in view of the amount already paid. Since the issue involves determination of the appropriate basis for computation of court fee, the matter may kindly be placed before the Hon'ble Chairperson for judicial directions. Next Datc 16.10.2026 4--t (Prabhupada Panda) Registrar DRAT- Mumbai