Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

CEAT LIMITED vs BANK OF BARODA(ERSTWHILE DENA BANK) AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Sr. No. 28 FARAD DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - MUMBAI REGULAR APPEAL NO.29 OF 2024 Advocate Sonali Jain present for the Appellant. Advocate Disha Shah present for R-1. None for the other Respondents. As directed, no application for amendment has been filed. Steps for service upon the Respondents have also not been taken. Advocate for the Appellant submitted that the Appellant is not seeking any relief against R-2 to R-10. Advocate for the Appellant is accordingly directed to file an additional affidavit specifically stating that no relief is being claimed against R-2 to R-I0. In the event the said affidavit is not filed on or before the next date, the matter shall be placed befbre the Hon'ble Chairperson Adj. for POS. 4^-./ (Prabhupada Panda) Registrar DRAT- Munrbai Next Date ROZNAMA Date 28.09.2026 for appropriate orders.

09. r 0.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead