PARESHBHAI VIRJIBHAI BHALIYA vs Bank of Baroda on 22 October 2026

1. Present as under: Mr. Tushar Gujjar, Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Mumtaz Khan, Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. No representation for other Respondents despite repeated calls.

2. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant/Auction Purchaser would submit that he has filed an application online on 13.08.2026 for interim relief for permission to do the interior work and to set aside the order dated 12.11.2025.

3. On query, the Counsel for the Appellant would submit that this application has not been filed physically in the registry and not registered.

4. Per Contra, the Counsel for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 mortgagor/guarantor would submit that there is no question of urgency as this application was filed after nine months of the order

and the physical copy of the application is not filed till today consequently not registered therefore the same can not be entertained. He would further submit that if the Appellant chooses to file this application physically then they would like to make the formal reply to this application.

5. The Appellant is directed to file this application in the registry.

6. The Counsel for the Appellant would further submit that there is an urgency in this matter however, the order which is being impugned by way of this application is dated 12.11.2025.

7. Admittedly, this application is filed on 13.08.2026 that is to say after 9 months and physically this application has not been filed till date. There seems to be no urgency for the same.

8. List the matter on 21.01.2027 for hearing. Sd/- Chairperson 22.10.2026

VKC-03