Central Administrative Tribunal

Sunila Devi vs RAILWAY on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 7 M.A./260/2026 (PATNA) [ RESTORATION ] In O.A./461/2021 RETIRAL BENEFITS M.A./261/2026 CONDONATION OF DELAY Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 4 Order Dated: 15/10/2026 SUNILA DEVI Vs RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri Gunsagar Mahto For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri M.D. Dwivedi, ld. ASC Order of The Tribunal Shri Gunsagar Mahto, ld. counsel for applicant and Shri M.D. Dwivedi, ld. ASC for opposite parties are present. Counsel for applicant at very outset has submitted that he may be given an opportunity to submit the legal provisions/pronouncements on the point of condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. Counsel for opposite parties has not objected. Considered the submission of counsel for applicant. In the interest of justice, the date for today is adjourned.

List the case on 26.11.2026. Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Manoranjan Sinha ( ps )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead