Central Administrative Tribunal
Neeraj Kumar vs EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) on 8 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 7 O.A./679/2026 (RANCHI) [ PUNISHMENT ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 08/10/2026 NEERAJ KUMAR Vs EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO)
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha through VC mode For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Sumit Prakash, ASC Order of The Tribunal Counsel for applicant Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha through VC mode and counsel for opposite parties Mr. Sumit Prakash, ASC are present. Counsel for the applicant submitted his case. Heard the submission of the counsel for the applicant. The matter requires consideration; hence, notice needs to be issued to the opposite parties. Since Mr. Sumit Prakash, ASC, on receipt of an advance copy of the O.A., has appeared on behalf of the opposite parties and accepted notice, hence, issuance of notice is waived. Counsel for the opposite parties submitted that he may be given an opportunity and four weeks to file the written statement. Considered the submission of the counsel for the opposite parties.
Let the written statement be filed within four weeks. List the case on 11.12.2026. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Durgesh Uttam ( court master )