Central Administrative Tribunal
SHYMAL KISHOR SINGH vs BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD on 1 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 11 M.A./187/2026 (PATNA) [ SUBSETITUTION PETITION ] In O.A./1197/2019 PRESIDENTIAL ORDER M.A./188/2026 Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 3 Order Dated: 01/10/2026 SHYMAL KISHOR SINGH Vs BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. T.N. Thakur, Sr. CGSC Order of The Tribunal Counsel for the applicant and counsel for opposite party No. 1 are present. None is present on behalf of opposite party Nos. 2-8. Today is the date fixed for hearing on M.A. No. 187/2026, for which, by order dated 29.05.2026, an opportunity was given to the counsel for opposite party Nos. 2-8 to submit the reply to the M.A., but no reply has been filed on behalf of the aforesaid opposite parties. Even no one is present to pursue the case on behalf of opposite party Nos. 2-8. In view of the above, we heard the counsel for the applicant on the aforesaid M.A. No. 187/2026, which is for substitution.
It is stated by the counsel for the applicant that the sole applicant, Shyamal Kishor Singh, has died on 24.12.2025, leaving behind his only three nearest legal representatives. Counsel further submitted that there is no one except the aforesaid legal representatives of the applicant. The application is supported with an affidavit and has been filed within the prescribed period of limitation. Counsel for the applicant has mentioned the wife as well as one son and one daughter of the deceased as legal representatives. Counsel for opposite party No. 1 is only a formal party in the case, and the main contesting parties are opposite party Nos. 2-8. the contention of the above M.A. has not been controverted by the opposite parties. Hence, the M.A. is allowed. The applicant is directed to incorporate the amendment within a week. Counsel for the applicant has also submitted M.A. No. 188/2026 for joining together the parties. He submitted that the applicants have common interest and common relief as well as the same cause of action. Hence, he may be permitted to join in a single O.A.
In the light of Rule 4 (5) of Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987, M.A. No. 188/2026 is allowed. Accordingly, both the M.As. Nos. 187/2026 & 188/2026 are disposed of. List the case on 02.12.2026 for additional written statement, if any, as well as for final hearing. Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Durgesh Uttam ( court master )