Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
M P Ananta Vatsalya vs Kotak Mahindra Bank on 27 July 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Regular Appeal Dy. No. 605 of 2026; Date: 27/07/2026
Mr. M.P. Ananta Vatsalya------- Appellant
Versus
Kotak Mahindra Bank & Ors. --- Respondent Order No.05 27.07.2026
Ld. Advocate Mr. S. B. Dasgupta appears for the Appellant and prays time to file affidavit of service for newspaper publication upon respondent no. 4 in compliance to order dated 16/06/2026 passed by the Hon’ble Chairperson.
Ld. Advocate Ms. Rita Khatun appears on behalf of Ld. Advocate Anna Malhotra for Respondent no. 2 and undertakes to file vakalatnama by the next date.
Ld. Advocate for Appellant filed affidavit of service on 09/07/2026 in respect of respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 in compliance of the order dated 16/06/2026 passed by the Hon’ble Chairperson. It was seen from the affidavit that sufficient service has been caused upon respondent no. 1 and 2 but service was not sufficient upon respondent no. 4 and as per request of Ld. Advocate for Appellant order for filing affidavit of service for newspaper publication upon remaining Respondent No. 4 was made.
No one appears for the other respondents. However, Registry has received one vakalatnama filed by Ld. Advocate Mr. L. Venkateshwar Rao for respondent no. 4. Hence, service upon respondent no. 1, 2 and 4 is sufficient.
The instant matter may be placed before the Hon’ble Chairperson on 07/08/2026 as already fixed.
REGISTRAR