Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

INDUSIND BANK vs Manohara Greens Logistics Pvt Ltd on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON Appeal No. 88 of 2026

Order No.06 14.09.2026

The Branch Manager Indusind Bank & Anr. ……Appellant -Vs- Manohara Green Logistics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Sayak Ranjan Ganguly, Ms. Chaitali Acharjee, Learned Counsel for the Appellants Mr. Debashis Karmakar, Mr. T.V. Narsimham, Mr. Satyam Ojha, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 & 6. THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL : Vakalatnama filed by the Respondent No. 1 and 6 is taken on record. Learned Counsel for the Respondents prays for and is allowed two weeks’ time to file opposition to I.A. 476 of 2025. Respondent No. 2 is still not served. Fresh notices be issued. Affidavit of service be filed within two weeks. Respondent No. 2 may be served through publication. List on 9th December, 2026 for hearing of I.A. 476 of 2026. (Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated 14th September, 2026 17/tk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead