Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
BANK OF BARODA vs M/s MILLETO FOOD INDUSTRIES on 17 August 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON Appeal Diary No. 568 of 2026 Order No. 04 17.08.2026 Bank of Baroda ... Appellant -Vs- M/s. Milleto Food Industries & 7 0thers … Respondents Mr. Dipanjan Datta (Verbal) with Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury with Ms. Esha Basak, Learned Counsel for Appellant Ms. P. Hamsa Durga (Virtual), Learned Counsel for Respondents THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: I.A. 487 of 2026 Application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of 96 days delay in preferring the appeal against judgment and order dated 23.4.2026. Appeal is filed on 01.6.2026. Ms. P. Hamsa Durga appears for the Respondent, who undertakes to file Vakalatnama during course of the day, opposes the prayer for condonation of delay. Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that the delay is not intentional rather caused due to procedural issues in taking necessary approval. Having considered the submission, I find the ground sufficient for condoning the delay.
2 Accordingly, I.A. 487 of 2026 is allowed. Delay in preferring the appeal is condoned. Admit the appeal by providing regular appeal number. Opposition to the appeal be filed within two weeks with copy to Appellant. List on 27th August, 2026 for hearing at Camp Court Hyderabad.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated: 17th August, 2026 02/ac