Central Administrative Tribunal
JOYTI PANDITA vs SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT on 31 December 2025
:: 1 ::
O.A. No. 2128/2025
Central Administrative Tribunal
Jammu Bench, Jammu
Hearing through video conferencing
Original Application No. 2128 of 2025
This the 31st day of December, 2025
Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mrs. Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
1. Jyoti Pandita, Age 49 years, D/o Late Pran Nath Pandita, R/o House no. 11, Lane no. 4, Bohri Jammu-180002.
...Applicant
(Through Advocate: Mr. Arshad Majid Malik)
Versus
1. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, through its Secretary to Govt., School Education Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu-180001.
2. The Director, School Education Department, Kashmir-190001.
..Respondents
(Through Advocate: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned A.A.G.)
Location:
Date: 2026.01.01 15:03:22+05'30'
POOJA
SONI
:: 2 ::
O.A. No. 2128/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
(Per: Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member) The instant Original Application (in short O.A.) has been filed by the applicant seeking the following reliefs:-
(i) issue appropriate directions to the respondents to permit the applicant to resume and perform her duties against the post of Teacher at Government Middle School, Mashali Mohalla (Hawal), pursuant to her lawful appointment under order no. 810-Edu of 2010 dated 24.11.2010 and adjustment order dated 29.12.2010, issued after a valid and transparent selection process;
(ii) direct the respondents to extend all consequential service benefits to the applicant as may be admissible under law, including continuity of service and other attendant benefits, subject to rules.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant would be satisfied, at this stage, if a direction is issued to respondents to treat a copy of this O.A. as her representation along with earlier representation dated 29.07.2025 and decide the case of the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time frame.
3. Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned A.A.G. appears on behalf of the respondents.
4. Accordingly, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, the Original Application is disposed of at the admission stage, without entering into the merits of the case, with a direction to respondents to treat a copy of this Original Application as
Location: Date: 2026.01.01 15:03:22+05'30' POOJA SONI
:: 3 :: O.A. No. 2128/2025
representation of the applicant along with earlier representation dated 29.07.2025 submitted by the applicant and decide the case of the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of the speaking order shall also be communicated to the applicant.
5. With these directions, Original Application No. 2128 of 2025 stands disposed of.
6. No orders so as to costs.
(Pragya Sahay Saksena)
(Sanjeev Gupta) Administrative Member
Judicial Member Poojasoni…
Location: Date: 2026.01.01 15:03:22+05'30' POOJA SONI