Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
STATE BANK OF INDIA vs MR. IMRAN KHAN on 25 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II, DELHI**
**NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HELD ON 25.10.2026 (SUNDAY)**
**Organised By:** DRT-II, Delhi
**Authority:** DSLSA, Delhi
**TA/2027/2022**
**Petitioner/Applicant : STATE BANK OF INDIA**
**Defendant/Respondent : MR. IMRAN KHAN**
**No. of Proceedings of the Item No.55 of the Tribunal**
**Name of Presiding Officer : Shri Sushil Kumar Rastogi, Presiding Officer, DRT-II, Delhi & National Lok Adalat Judge**
**Name of Members (1) Shri Ashok Kumar, Retd. District Judge, Member**
**AWARD**
This matter is taken by this Tribunal in hybrid mode i.e. physical as well as through Video Conferencing.
The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the National Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised/settled the case/matter, the following Award is passed in terms of the Settlement.
Present:- Mr. Raj Kumar, Counsel for applicant bank alongwith Mr. Shreenarayan, Sah, Chief Manager Mr. Imran Khan, defendant in person Both the parties have agreed in principal to settled the TA/2027/2022 for a composite amount of Rs. 15,50,000/- out of which Rs.1.55 lacs has been deposited by the defendant. The remaining amount of Rs. 13,95,000/- shall be paid by 15.11.2026. In case of default by the defendant in payment of settlement amount by 15.11.2026, the applicant bank is at liberty to revive the case and the recover the OA amount.
Accordingly, the dispute between the parties stands amicably settled.
This compromise settlement between the parties is suo motto and with free will.
In these circumstances, compromise is recorded. Now, the matter stand disposed of in terms of compromise and the original documents, if any, filed before DRT-II, Delhi be returned to applicant bank. The date already fixed in the matter before DRT stands cancelled. The file be consigned to record room.
The applicant bank is at liberty to move an appropriate application for seeking refund of court fees.
Rastogi/Adh
**ROAC Petitioner/Applicant**
**ROAC**
**Defendant/Respondent**
**(Retd. District Judge)**