Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
J.C.FLOWERS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED vs M/s. Lily Realty Pvt Ltd on 16 October 2026
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL –I AT CHENNAI
Dated this 16th Day of October, 2026
PRESENT: SHRI A.S.JAYACHANDRA
Presiding Officer
TA 150 of 2022
(OA 1311/2021 – DRT-2, Bangalore)
BETWEEN:
J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., Acting in its capacity as trustee of JCF ARC Trust 2024-25/39, Having office at 203-206, 2nd Floor, Wing A, Inspire BKC, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai – 400 051.
. . . Applicant
And
1.
Lily Realty Pvt. Ltd.
Having its registered office at:
Also at:
2nd Floor, Dodda Mane Bldg.,
19/1, Vittal Mallya Road,
Bengaluru – 560 001.
2.
Mr. Asit Koticha,
Rameshwara Apartment, 19th Floor,
Palkhewadi, K.D. Marg,
Prabhadevi, Mumbai -400 028.
3.
Mrs. Kanan Koticha,
Rameshwara Apartment, 19th Floor,
Palkhewadi, K.D. Marg,
Prabhadevi, Mumbai -400 028.
4.
Aahana Realty Pvt. Ltd.
5.
Swarit Realty Pvt. Ltd.,
Having registered office at:
6.
IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd.
Having its registered office at:
Ground Floor, Asian Building,
17, R Kamani Road, Ballard Estate, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001
. . . Defendants
PROCEEDINGS DATED – 16.10.2026
Applicant by Ms. Aishwarya, Adv.
D1 to D5 by Ms. Vasunthra, Adv – appears through VC.
None for D6.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed the amended memo of parties along with the memo of consent terms.
It is submitted by both the counsel that the parties have entered into Restructuring Support Finance Facility (RSF) vide the terms of settlement dated 22.04.2026; accordingly the joint memo is filed dated 02.06.2026.
Heard the Ld. Counsel on the joint memo of compromise.
ORDERS ON THE JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE DATED 02.06.2026
1. The joint compromise memo is filed by the applicant and the defendant no. 1 to 5 seeking disposal of the matter since settled outside the Tribunal. The same is duly signed by all the parties which is executed at Mumbai. The same is also duly notarized.
2. The OA was originally filed by Yes Bank for recovery of Rs.386,58,15,235/- against defendants 1 to 5 before the DRT – II, Bangalore OA 1311 of 2021 which is now re-numbered after the transfer of the case to this Tribunal.
3. The original applicant Yes Bank had assigned the debt claimed in favour of M/s. JC Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited passing through the earlier assignee. The substitution of this ARC is allowed vide order dated 08.10.2026.
4. According to the parties the present settlement is arrived after failure of earlier two settlements.
5. The present settlement shows that the applicant ARC had granted Restructuring Support Finance Facility (RSF) to the tune of Rs.30 crores.
The same is covered under the settlement sanction letter dated 22.04.2026 which is acted upon by both the parties. Accordingly, an amount of Rs.10 crores from the designated escrow account is appropriated and adjusted in terms of the sanction letter. The settlement amount is Rs.106,40,00,000/- as per the timelines fixed which is payable under nine installments and the last installment being 31.03.2029 as mention in para no. 3 of the settlement terms.
6. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel on both the sides that in case the defendants 1 to 5 fail, in honoring the terms of settlement as per the timelines fixed / agreed or in the case of breach, the settlement would stand revoked at the discretion of the applicant. It is also agreed that in case of such default the debt outstanding as on the date of termination along with interest and other charges post appropriation would stand re-instated for which it is agreed that the recovery certificate could be issued.
7. After going through the settlement terms and the application filed, it is seen that the parties have agreed to a settlement outside the Tribunal and the Ld. counsel submit that the TA may be disposed of in terms of the settlement mentioned in the consent memorandum dated 02.06.2026. In view of the above, the present TA stands disposed of by the following;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The TA 150/2022 stands disposed of as settled between the parties in terms of the settlement reached between the parties dated 22.04.2026 as reported in the joint memo dated 02.06.2026. The parties are hereby directed to adhere to the terms of settlement. It is also made clear that in case of default or breach of the settlement terms, the applicant is entitled to such of the reliefs as cited at para no. 10 of the settlement sanction dated 22.04.2026. There shall be no order as to costs. A copy of this order be communicated to all the parties concerned, separately incorporating the names of the parties as per the amended memo of parties filed today. Sd/- (A.S.JAYACHANDRA)
PRESIDING OFFICER
DRT-I, CHENNAI (Dictated to Stenographer who typed in the system, corrected, signed and pronounced in open court on this 16th Day of October, 2026)