Central Administrative Tribunal
Kafil Ahmed vs Mr Khalid Jahangir & ANRs on 31 December 2021
:: 1 ::
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
C.P. No. 61/150/2021
In
O.A. No. 61/371/2021
This the 31st day of December 2021
HON’BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. ANAND MATHUR, MEMBER (A)
1.
Kafil Ahmed, Age 36 years, S/o Kalu Khan, R/o Bhatidar, Tehsil Mendhar, District Poonch.
2.
Jaswant Kumar, Age 38 years, S/o Sh. Krishan Lal, R/o Village Lam, Tehsil Nowshera District Rajouri.
........................Applicants
(Advocate:- Mr. N D Qazi-Not Present)
Versus
1.
Mr. Khalid Jahangir (KAS) Chairman, J&K Service Selection Board, Jammu-
180001.
2.
Mr. Sachin Jamwal (KAS), Secretary, J&K Service Selection Board, Jammu-
180001.
...................Respondents
(Advocate: Mr. Rajesh Thapa, learned D.A.G.)
O R D E R
[O R A L] (Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member-J)
Page 1 of 2
Despite sending the link to the learned counsel for the applicant for joining the video conference and the case being listed in the regular cause list, he has not joined the video conference.
2. On the last dates also i.e., 20.09.2021 and 26.10.2021, nobody had appeared on behalf of the applicant. In any case, we have gone through the contents of the Contempt Petition, no case for contempt is made out against the respondents. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed and notices issued stand discharged.
(ANAND MATHUR) (RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J) Arun
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…