Nek Ram vs FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS on 31 December 2021

O R D E R

[O R A L] (Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member-J)

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is seeking quashment of Communication No. DFCS & CAJ/89/RDA/192 dated 23.01.2019 whereby article of charges were served to him. Further, the applicant is seeking quashment of communication dated 04.01.2020 whereby it has been directed to withheld the annual increments for the next three years. He is also seeking quashment of communication

:: 2 ::

dated 10.01.2020 whereby his appeal has been rejected and even his representation has also been rejected. Hence, the present O.A.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the respondents to treat this O.A. as representation of the applicant and take a decision on the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated time frame.

3. We have heard Mr.Raghu Mehta, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Sudesh Magotra, learned D.A.G. for the respondents and perused the records.

4. Looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, we dispose of the O.A. with direction to the respondents to treat this O.A. as representation of the applicant under rules and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of the Speaking Order be given to the applicant.

5. It is made clear that we have not entered into the merits of the case.

6. No order as to costs.

(ANAND MATHUR) (RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)

MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J)

yaksh…