Central Administrative Tribunal
Harsh Dev vs POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT on 30 December 2021
:: 1 ::
O.A. No. 61/1891/2021
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
O.A. No. 61/1891/2021
This the 30th day of December, 2021
HON’BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. ANAND MATHUR, MEMBR (A)
Harsh Dev, age 29 years, S/o Rajinder Singh, Adopted S/o Lt. Devinder Singh, R/o Ward No.7, H.No.138, Hari Nagar, Tehsil & District Udhampur.
........................Applicant
(Advocate: Mr.A.R. Bhat)
Versus
1.
Union Territory of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Power Development Department, Civil Secretariat, At present at Jammu/Srinagar-
180001.
2.
Managing Director, Power Development Corp Ltd, Jammu.-180001. (Ministry of Power Development Corp.)
3.
Chief Engineer, Generation Wing, JKSPDC, Power Development Corp. Ltd., Adarsh Enclave, Sector-1, Trikuta Nagar, Jammu.-180012. (Ministry of Power Development Corp.)
4.
Executive Engineer, Generation Division, JKSPDC, Power Development Corp.
Ltd. Udhampur-182101.(Ministry of Power Development Corp.)
...................Respondents
(Advocate: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned DAG)
:: 2 ::
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] (Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Anand Mathur, Member-A)
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is aggrieved of the inaction on the part of the respondents of not considering his case for appointment on compassionate grounds after his father expired on 04.04.2019 at Udhampur. Hence, the present O.A.
2. We have heard Mr. A.R. Bhat, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned DAG for the respondents and perused the records.
3. Looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, we dispose of the O.A. with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for compassionate appointment as per rules and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of the Speaking Order be given to the applicant.
4. It is made clear that we have not entered into the merits of the case.
5. No order as to costs.
(ANAND MATHUR) (RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J)
yaksh…