Central Administrative Tribunal
Tej Bhan vs DEFENCE on 30 December 2021
CE
HON’B
HON
Tej Bhan, Age
Jammu, Pincode-1800
(Advocate: Mr.Pawan
1.
Union Territory
New Delhi. Pin
2.
Engineer in Ch
New Delhi-110
3.
Chief Engineer
4.
Principal Cont
Pincode-13300
5.
Garrison Engin
(Advocate: Mr.Raghu
(Delivered by Hon’bl
Learned counse
the respondents to gran
virtue of judgment dat
Karnail Singh Jandu a
Bench of this Tribunal
:: 1 ::
ENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNA
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
This the 30th day of December, 2021
BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMB
N’BLE MR. ANAND MATHUR, MEMBER
e 73 years, S/o Ram Lal, R/o H.No. 144, Sec
20.
...............
Dev Singh)
Versus
y of India, Ministry of Defence, through its S
ncode-110011.
hief, Army Headquarters, Kashmir House, R
0011.
r, Northern Command, Udhampur J&K, Pinco troller of Defence Accounts (PCDA) Pensi
01.
neer (GE), South Akhnoor, Jammu. Pincode-1
............
Mehta, learned SCGSC)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] le Mr.Anand Mathur, Member-A) el for the applicant submits that the applicant nt similar benefit to him, as has been provid ted 30.05.2007 in O.A No.431-CH-2006 titl and others vs Union of India and others” pas
l. Hence, the present O.A.
AL BER (J) R (A) ctor 1/P Trikuta Nagar, ..........Applicant Secretary, South Block, Rajaji Marg, DHQ PQ, ode-182101. ions, Allahabad (UP), 181201. ........Respondents t is seeking direction to ed to the applicants by ed “MES No. 155173, sed by the Chandigarh
2. Learned couns satisfied, if a direction the applicant and take within a stipulated tim
3. We have hear Mr.Raghu Mehta, learn
4. Looking to the dispose of the O.A. w of the applicant and di a period of six weeks considering the applic claim being articulated as per the view taken Anr. V. Jawant Singh K. Roy & Ors. (2004 expressed any opinion case laws relied upon b
5. No order as to
(ANAND MATHU
MEMBER (A)
Yaksh… :: 2 :: sel for the applicant further submits that n is given to the respondents to treat this O.A e a decision on the same by passing a reason me frame. rd Mr.Pawan Dev Singh, learned counsel ned SCGC for the respondents and perused th e limited prayer made by the learned counse with direction to the respondents to treat this ispose of the same by passing a reasoned and s from the date of receipt of a certified cop ant’s case, the respondents should also exam d now has become stale or dead due to inord in Supreme Court decisions such as Chairm & Anr., JT 2006(10) SC 500 and Govt. of W 4)1 SCC 347. However, it is to be noted n on merits of the applicant’s case nor examin by him. A copy of the Speaking Order be giv costs. UR) (RAKES ) ME
the applicant will be A. as representation of ned and speaking order for the applicant and he records. el for the applicant, we O.A. as representation d speaking order within y of this order. While mine as to whether their dinate delay and laches man, UP Jal Nigam & West Bengal vs. Tarun that we have neither ned applicability of the en to the applicant. SH SAGAR JAIN) EMBER (J)