Central Administrative Tribunal
Imran Latief vs HOME DEPARTMENT on 30 December 2021
:: 1 ::
O.A. No. 61/1903/2021
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
O.A. No. 61/1903/2021
This the 30th day of December, 2021
HON’BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. ANAND MATHUR, MEMBR (A)
Imran Latief, age 33 years, S/o Mohd. Latief, R/o Ward No. 13, Peer Kanju, Tehsil & District Rajouri.
........................Applicant
(Advocate: Mr.Ritesh Sharma)
Versus
1.
Union Territory of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt., Home Department, Civil Sect. Srinagar/Jammu, Pincode-180001.
2.
The Director of General of Police, J&K, Jammu/Srinagar. Pincode-180001.
3.
The Inspector General of Police, Kashmir Zone, Srinagar. Pincode-190001.
4.
DIG, South Kashmir Range, Police Headquarters Anantnag. Pincode-192101.
...................Respondents
(Advocate: Mr.Rajesh Thapa, learned DAG)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] (Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Anand Mathur, Member-A)
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is seeking directions upon the respondents to consider and decide his representation dated 11.09.2021. Hence, the present O.A.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the respondents to treat this O.A. as representation of
:: 2 ::
the applicant and take a decision on the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated time frame.
3. We have heard Mr.Ritesh Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Rajesh Thapa, learned DAG for the respondents and perused the records.
4. Looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, we dispose of the O.A. with direction to the respondents to treat this O.A. as representation of the applicant and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of the Speaking Order be given to the applicant.
5. It is made clear that we have not entered into the merits of the case.
6. No order as to costs.
(ANAND MATHUR) (RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J)
yaksh…