Central Administrative Tribunal
JYOTI GUPTA vs SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT on 30 December 2021
CE
HON’B
HON
Jyoti Gupta.
(Advocate:- Mr.Abrar
UT of J&K and Ors.
(Advocate: Mr.Rajesh
(Delivered by Hon’bl
Despite sendin
video conference and t
video conference on be
2.
On the last list
the petitioner. It seem
Accordingly, the T.A.
(ANAND MATHU
MEMBER (A)
Yaksh
:: 1 ::
ENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNA
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
T.A. No. 61/8060/2021
This the 30th day of December 2021
BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMB
N’BLE MR. ANAND MATHUR, MEMBER
.................
r Ahmad Khan -not present)
Versus
....
Thapa, Learned DAG)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] le Mr.Anand Mathur, Member-A) ng the link to the learned counsel for the pet the case being listed in the regular cause list, ehalf of the petitioner. ted date also, nobody had joined the video co ms that the petitioner has lost interest in is dismissed due to non appearance of petitio UR) (RAKES ) ME T.A. No. 61/8060/2021
AL BER (J) R (A) ........Petitioner ................Respondents titioner for joining the nobody has joined the onference on behalf of pursuing the matter. oner. SH SAGAR JAIN) EMBER (J)