Central Administrative Tribunal

Atul Sharma vs D/o Animal & Sheep Husbandry Ut Of J&k on 30 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

:: 1 ::

O.A. No. 61/1303/2020

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU

Hearing through video conferencing

O.A. No. 61/1303/2020

This the 30th day of December, 2020

HON’BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER (J)

1. Atul Sharma Age 26 years

S/o S.Yog Raj

R/o Gole Mela, Tehsil & District

Udhampur,

Mobile No.7006097452.

2. Bushan Kumar Age 27 years

S/o Sh.Sham Lal,

R/o Jandrore, Tehsil Ramnagar & District Udhampur, PIN No.182122.

3. Mohinder Kumar Age 26 years,

S/o Sh.Madan Lal,

R/o Madlote, Tehsil & District

Udhampur, PIN 182126

Mobile No.7889550886.

4. Deep Kumar Age 27 years

S/o Sh.Suram Chand

R/o Village Barta, Tehsil & District

Udhampur, PIN No.182124

Mobile no.6005029627.

:: 2 ::

........................Applicants

(Advocate: Mr.Anil Khajuria)

Versus

1.

The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, Through its Principal Secretary to Government, Animal /Sheep Husbandry & Fisheries Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu-180001.

2.

The Director,

Directorate of Animal Husbandry,

Jammu-180001.

3.

The Deputy Director,

Animal Husbandry, Jammu

180001.

4.

The Chief Animal Husbandry Officer,

Udhampur-182101.

...................Respondents

(Advocate: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, AAG)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

[O R A L]

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is given to respondents to consider and decide the representation of the applicants dated 25.09.2020 (Annexure A-4) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.

:: 3 ::

2. Looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, O.A is disposed of at the admission stage itself with a direction to respondents to decide the representation of the applicant 25.09.2020 (Annexure A-4) by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with rules and with intimation to the applicant within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

3. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

4. No order as to cost.

(RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)

MEMBER (J)

Ak/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead