Central Administrative Tribunal
Arun Kumar vs D/o Power Development Ut Of J&k on 30 December 2020
CENTR
HON’BL
Arun Kum
Rehari Co
(Advocate: Mr.P.N
1.
State of Ja
Developmen
2.
Karnail Sing
Engineer Sys
3.
Kewal Krish
System and O
4.
Kuldeep Sin
Director, Pow
5.
Shiv Kumar
Power Devel
6.
Farooq Ahm
Director, Pow
7.
Mohd. Yousu
Power Devel
8.
Ab. Qadir B
Developmen
9.
Shiban Ji K
Developmen
10.
Ab.Majid Bh
Power Devel
(Advocate:- Mr. Su
RAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIB
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
T.A./61/9354/2020
This the 30th day of December, 202
LE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, M
mar S/o Late Sh.Om Prakash R/o 318
olony, Jammu Age 46 years.
...........
N. Bhat )
Versus
ammu & Kashmir, Through Pr.
nt Department, J&K Jammu.
gh Lalotre presently posted as JE in t
stem and Operation Wing of PDD Jamm
han presently posted as JE in teh office Operation Wing of PDD Jammu.
ngh Bahu presently posted as AE
wer Development Cooperation, Jammu
Gupta presently posted as AEE with M
lopment Corporation, Jammu.
mad Geelani presently posted as J
wer Development Corporation , Jammu
uf Bhat presently posted as JE with M
lopment Corporation, Jammu.
Bhat presently posted as JE Managin
nt Corporation , Jammu.
Koul presently as AEE with Managin
nt Corporation, Jammu.
hat presently posted as AEE with M
lopment Corporation, Jammu.
........
udesh Magotra, DAG)
BUNAL
20
MEMBER (J)
, hari Singh Nagar,
.............Applicants
Secretary Power
the office of Chief
mu.
e of Chief Engineer
E with Managing
u.
Managing Director,
JE with Managing
u.
Managing Direction,
ng Director Power
ng Director, Power
Managing Director,
...........Respondents
:: 2 ::
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member (J): - Shri P.N. Bhat, learned counsel for the applicant submits that TA has become infructuous by efflux of time as such, he do not wish to pursue this TA.
2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the TA is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
(RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (J)
Ak/-