Central Administrative Tribunal
Muzaffar Iqbal vs D/o Home Ut Of Jammu & Kashmir on 30 December 2020
CENTR
HON’BL
Muzaffar Iqb
Distt. Doda,
(Advocate: None)
1.
State of Jam
J&K, Civil S
2.
Commission
Affairs, Civi
3.
Director Gen
(Advocate:- Mr. Su
Delivered by Hon’
Despite send
not appeared for t
phone.
2.
Shri Sudesh M
RAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIB
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
T.A./61/9336/2020
This the 30th day of December, 202
LE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, M
bal S/o Abdul Aziz R/o Old Bus Stand,
age 59 years.
...........
Versus.
mmu & Kashmir, through its Chief Sec
Secretariat, Jammu.
er/Secretary to Govt. Of J&K, Dep
l Secretariat, Jammu.
neral of Prisons, J&K at Jammu.
........
udesh Magotra, DAG)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] ’ble Mr. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member ding the pin to the learned counsel for th the Video Conference. He has also n Magotra, learned counsel for the respo BUNAL 20 MEMBER (J) , Nagar Bhadarwah, .............Applicant cretary to Govt. Of partment of Home
...........Respondents r (J): - he applicant, he has not picking up the ondents is present.
:: 2 ::
3. The Hon’ble High Court vide its order dated 07.10.2020 directed the applicant to appear before this Tribunal on 30.12.2020 i.e. today. Neither the applicant nor the learned counsel for the applicant put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
4. It appears that applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (J)
Ak/-