Central Administrative Tribunal
Javed Iqbal vs D/o Service Selection Board Ut Of J&k on 30 December 2020
CENTR
HON’BL
1. Javed Iqb
S/o Bashi
R/o Gham
2. Rafaqat H
S/o Zafaz
R/o Ujhan
Tehsil Dh
District R
3. Musharif
S/o Ghula
R/o Posha
Distt. Poo
(Advocate: None)
1.
State of Jam
Secretariat S
2.
J&K Service
Ram Bagh, S
3.
J&K Service
Ram Bagh, S
4.
Meenakshi K
Bhaderwah,
5.
Rifat Khan, S
(Advocate:- Mr. Su
RAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIB
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
T.A./61/9345/2020
This the 30th day of December, 202
LE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, M
bal, Age 37 years
ir Ahmad,
mbir Mughlan, The & Distt. Rajouri.
Hussain, Age 36 years,
z Ullah
n Mohre Dhandkote,
hanne Mandi,
Rajouri
Ayaz, Age 25 years,
am Nabi Dar,
ana, TesL Surankote,
onch.
...........
Versus.
mmu & Kashmir, Principal Secretary,
rinagar.
e Selection Board through Chairman, Z
Srinagar.
e Selection Board through Secretary, Z
Srinagar.
Kotwal, D/o Sh. Mool Raj Kotwal,
Doda.
S/o Mohd. Akbar Khan, R/o Vill Ranbi
........
udesh Magotra, DAG)
BUNAL
20
MEMBER (J)
.............Applicants
PWD Deptt. Civil
Zum Zum Building,
Zum Zum Building,
R/o Naska Chinta
irpora, Anantnag.
...........Respondents
:: 2 ::
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member (J): - The mobile number of the learned counsel for the applicant is not traced out.
2. The case was listed today but nobody appeared on behalf of the learned counsel for the applicant for the Video Conference.
3. Shri Sudesh Magotra, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
4. The Hon’ble High Court vide its order dated 07.10.2020 directed the applicant to appear before this Tribunal on 30.12.2020 i.e. today. Neither the applicant nor the learned counsel for the applicant put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
5. It appears that applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (J)
Ak/-