Central Administrative Tribunal
Abdul Hamid vs D/o Service Selection Board Ut Of J&k on 30 December 2020
CENTR
HON’BL
Abdul Hamid
Thannamand
(Advocate: None)
1.
State of Jam
Secretariat, S
2.
J&K Service
Jammu.
3.
Director, Sch
4.
Chief Educat
(Advocate:- Mr. Am
Delivered by Hon’
Despite send
not appeared for t
phone.
RAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIB
JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Hearing through video conferencing
T.A./61/9320/2020
This the 30th day of December, 202
LE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, M
d, age 40 year S/o Sh. Alaf Din R/o S
di, District Rajouri.
...........
Versus.
mmu & Kashmir, through its Chie
Srinagar/Jammu.
e Selection Board through its Secretar
hool Education, Muthi, Jammu.
tion Officer, Rajouri.
........
mit Gupta, AAG)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[O R A L] ’ble Mr. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member ding the pin to the learned counsel for th the Video Conference. He has also n BUNAL 20 MEMBER (J) Same Samat, Tehsil, .............Applicant ef Secretary, Civil ry Panama Chowk,
...........Respondents r (J): - he applicant, he has not picking up the
:: 2 ::
2. Shri Amit Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
3. The Hon’ble High Court vide its order dated 07.10.2020 directed the applicant to appear before this Tribunal on 30.12.2020 i.e. today. Neither the applicant nor the learned counsel for the applicant put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
4. It appears that applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(RAKESH SAGAR JAIN)
MEMBER (J)
Ak/-