Central Administrative Tribunal

Roshan Lal vs D/o General Administration Ut Of J&k on 30 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

:: 1 ::

T.A. No. 61/9350/2020

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU

Hearing through video conferencing

T.A. No. 61/9350/2020

This the 30th day of December, 2020

HON’BLE MR. RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER (J)

Roshan Lal age 34 years S/o Sh.Suram Chand R/o W.No.Ram Nagar, District Udhampur.

........................Applicant

(Advocate: Mr.Dhiraj Choudhary)

Versus.

1.

State through Commissioner/Secretary,

To Housing and Urban Development,

J&K Govt. Civil Sectt. Srinagar.

2.

Commissioner/Secretary to General Administrative Department, Civil Sectt. Srinagar.

3.

Director Urban Local Bodies, Jammu.

4.

Administrative/Executive Officer,

Municipal Committee, Ram Nagar, Udhampur.

5.

President Municipal Committee, Ram Nagar, Udhampur.

...................Respondents

(Advocate: Mr.Sudesh Magotra)

:: 2 ::

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

[O R A L]

Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Anand Mathur, Member (A): -

1. The present TA has been received by way of transfer from Hon’ble High Court of J&K at Jammu. It has been submitted at the Bar that since the respondent Municipal Committee, Jammu has not been brought within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal by a notification to be issued by the Central Government under Sec. 14 (2) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, the Tribunal cannot assume jurisdiction in respect of any service matter pertaining the Municipal Committee, Jammu under the Act. I accordingly hold that this Tribunal is not vested with any jurisdiction to entertain any petition related to any service dispute in the Municipal Committee, Jammu.

2. In similar circumstances, the Bench of Armed Forces Tribunal, Jammu comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Tahir, Member (J) and Hon’ble Vice Admiral A. G. Thapliyal in TA No. 267 of 2017 (SWP No. 1188 of 2014) titled Bahadur Singh v/s Union of India vide order dated 25.03.2019 held that since the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to deal with the matter, the case be sent back to the Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Jammu & Kashmir to be listed before the appropriate Bench.

3. Therefore, since this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the present case, this case be sent back to Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu to place before the Hon’ble Bench for further orders.

:: 3 ::

4. Both the parties are directed to appear before the Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Jamxmu & Kashmir at Srinagar on 17.02.2021.

(RAKESH SAGAR JAIN) MEMBER (J)

Ak/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead