Central Administrative Tribunal
SARA TARIQ vs GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT on 21 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU Order Sheet Item no.: 19 O.A./1326/2026 (JAMMU) [ APPOINTMENT ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 3 Order Dated: 21/10/2026 SARA TARIQ Vs GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. M I Sherkhan For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned AAG for respondents no. 1, 2 and 8, Mr. Rajesh Thappa, learned AAG for respondents no. 3 to 7 Order of The Tribunal (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE) Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in pursuance of notification dated 01.06.2026 of respondent no. 1 department, select list for the post of Medical Officer (Allopathic) was issued in which name of the applicant figures at serial no. 407 under ST category. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has furnished all the documentary record for the verification of her character/antecedents as per letter dated 01.06.2026, however later on vide notification dated 02.09.2026, another select list was issued for the aforesaid post by the respondent no. 1 department, wherein name of the applicant does not figure. It is also submitted by learned counsel that applicant should not be made to suffer for any alleged crime which may have been committed by her father and while concluding his arguments, he prayed for grant of interim relief as claimed in the O.A. In support, he has placed reliance on the order dated 19.06.2026 passed by the coordinate bench of this Tribunal at Srinagar in O.A. No. 383 of 2024.
Learned AAGs appearing on behalf of the respondents vehemently opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Heard and considered. Let reply to the O.A. be filed by the respondents on or before the next date with advance copy to learned counsel for the applicant. List this case on 11.12.2026. Meanwhile, as an interim measure, subject to objections of the other side and till next date of hearing, it is directed that the post on which the applicant has been selected though not appointed in pursuance to Notification dated 01.06.2026, shall not be filled up by any mode. Pragya Sahay Saksena Member (A) Sanjeev Gupta Member (J) Pooja Soni ( court master )