Central Administrative Tribunal

Mohd Anjum vs SERVICE SELECTION BOARD on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU Order Sheet Item no.: 4 O.A./1441/2026 (JAMMU) [ APPOINTMENT ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 14/10/2026 MOHD ANJUM Vs SERVICE SELECTION BOARD

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Ashwani Sharma For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Rajesh Thappa, learned AAG for respondent no. 1, Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned A.A.G. for respondent no. 2 Order of The Tribunal (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE) Miscellaneous Application No. 1518 of 2026 The instant M.A. has been filed by the applicants seeking permission of this Tribunal to join in and pursue O.A. No. 1441 of 2026 together. For the reasons stated therein, the aforesaid M.A. is allowed. Original Application The applicants are aggrieved of the qualification prescribed for the post of Multi Tasking Staff (MTS) advertised vide Notification No. 09 of 2026 dated 01.09.2026 wherein the minimum and maximum qualification for appointment to Class-IV (MTS) under direct recruitment has been shown as "Minimum Matric and Maximum 10+2". It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that without waiting for the report of the committee constitututed by the GAD vide Government orders dated 12.03.2026 and 31.03.2026, the Service Selection Board has issued the impugned notification without reviewing the minimum and maximum qualification criteria for the aforesaid post.

Admit Issue notices to the respondents. Mr. Rajesh Thappa and Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned AAGs appear and accept notices on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2 respectively. It is submitted by learned counsels for the respondents that applicants can apply for the selection process for the post of MTS, if they possess the qualification as prescribed in the Advertisement Notification dated 01.09.2026. List this case on 20.11.2026. Let reply/objections to the O.A. be filed by the learned counsels for the respondents by the next date of hearing specifying therein the steps taken by the Committee consitituted by the GAD in terms of aforesaid Government orders. Pragya Sahay Saksena Member (A) Sanjeev Gupta Member (J) Pooja Soni ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead