Central Administrative Tribunal

Suraiya Rasool vs Directorate Of School Education Ut Of J&k on 30 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Hon’ble Mr

Suriya Rasoo

W/o Qazi Ab

R/o F8 Gove

Sirnagar.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Governm Secretary Departme Pin Code

2. Director S Pin Code

3. Chief Edu Pin Code

4. Chief Edu Pin Code

Hon’ble Mr Central Administrative Tribu Jammu Bench, Jammu Hearing through vid O.A. No.62/1305/2020

This the 30th December, 2020

r. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member (J) ol, age 30 yrs, bid Ali, ernment Quarters Jawahar Nagar, .... (Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate)

Versus ent of J&K through Commissioner/ to Govt. School Education, ent, Civil Sectt. Sirnagar/Jammu, 180001. School Education Kashmir, Srinagar. 190001. ucation Officer, Srinagar. 190001. ucation Officer, Baramulla 193101.

... (Mr. Amit Gupta, AGG) O R D E R (ORAL)

r. Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member (J) unal deo conferencing ...........Applicant ..... Respondents

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is given to respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the representation of the applicant within a stipulated period of time.

2. Looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, O.A is disposed of at the admission stage itself with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the representation of the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with rules within seven days from today also by treating her OA as part of the representation. Till the representation is considered respondents will not take any forcible action to repatriate the applicant from her present posting at Srinagar to Baramula.

3. Shri Sudesh Magotra, DAG appearing for the respondents will inform the respondents about the contents of this order and the directions given in this case. It is made clear that I have not entered into the merits of the case. No costs.

(Rakesh Sagar Jain)

Member (J)

Ak/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead