Supreme Court of India
SOHRAB ANSARI VS. STATE OF U.P. on 27 October 2026
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33600- 33601/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-07-2026
in WC No. 38276/2024 29-07-2026 in WC No. 9729/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]
SOHRAB ANSARI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)
FOR ADMISSION
IA No. 289517/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Mushtaque Ahmad, Adv.
Mr. Inam Ahmad Khan, Adv.
Ms. Sania Khan, Adv.
Mr. Anubhav, Adv.
Mr. Akhilesh Vikram Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Onkar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ramjee Pandey- 2376, AOR
For Respondent(s) :Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Anjale Kumari, Adv.
Mr. P Murugesan, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Yadav, Adv.
Ms. Pooja Shilpkar, Adv.
Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra- 728, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.
Digitally signed by KAPIL TANDON Date: 2026.10.27 17:44:21 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed and the accompanying interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (KAPIL TANDON) (NIDHI WASON) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR