Supreme Court of India

RAKESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ITEM NO.3 + 19 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-D

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.20279/2026

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-08-2026

in SBCRMBA No.11039/2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur]

RAKESH KUMAR

Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Respondent

I.A. No.324454/2026-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

I.A. No.324455/2026-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. WITH S.L.P. (Crl.) No.20015/2026 I.A. No.320462/2026-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

WITH S.L.P. (Crl) No.20303/2026 (II-D) I.A. No.324787/2026-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 27-10-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Yashwant Singh- 3912, AOR Mr. Pankaj Singhal, Adv. Ms. Ashima Gupta, Adv. Mr. Chandan Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Prince Pal Singh, Adv. Ms. Etti Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ayush Anand- 3409, AOR

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurabh Rajpal- 3577, AOR Mr. Vinay Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Raj, Adv.

Digitally signed by MANIK KUMAR Date: 2026.10.27 17:56:38 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1. Issue notice, returnable in the week commencing 07th December, 2026.

2. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State of Rajasthan. Service of formal notice, thus, stands dispensed with.

3. Respondent-State of Rajasthan may file its counter affidavit(s) two weeks prior to the returnable date indicating, inter alia, the current status of the proceedings, criminal antecedents of the petitioners; whether any co-accused has been enlarged on bail; and providing any other information relevant for a decision on the special leave petitions.

4. Rejoinder thereto, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter. (MANIK KUMAR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead