Supreme Court of India

M/S RADHA MADHAV ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES VS. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED (RINL) on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.11 SECTION XII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5067/2022

[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 22-09-2021 in CCA No. 11/2019 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amravati]

M/S RADHA MADHAV ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED (RINL) & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 14233/2022 (XIV)

IA No. 162626/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDL.DOCS./FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No.33970/2026- PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

Date : 27-10-2026 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR

Mr. Aditya Narendranath, Adv.

Mr. Naman Tyagi, Adv.

Mrs. M.B. Ramya, Adv.

Mrs. Deeksha Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Puspita Basak, Adv.

Mrs. Madhavi Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Naman Saraswat, Adv. (through VC)

Mr. Tavinder Sidhu, Adv.

For M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates- 1668, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv.

Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.

Mr. Varun Chandiok, Adv.

Mr. Shreyash Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Harshit Singh, Adv.

Mr. Sidharth Nair, Adv.

Mr. Yashwant Sanjenbam, Adv.

For M/S. K J John And Co- 1287, AOR

Ms. Samapika Biswal- 3177, AOR

Digitally signed by

NIRMALA NEGI

Date: 2026.10.27

17:16:51 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Ms. Pavitra Kaur, Adv.

Ms. Soumya Sannidhanam, Adv.

Ms. Shreya Mishra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 5067/2022

1. Heard Mr. Vipin Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Ms. Surekha Raman, learned counsel for the respondent(s).

2. Arguments concluded.

3. Judgment reserved.

4. Parties are at liberty to file short note(s) on submission(s) setting out the brief facts with page references and the legal propositions along with relied upon judgments, on or before 06.11.2026. SLP(C) No. 14233/2022

1. Mr. Naman Saraswat, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) draws attention to IA No.33970/2026 which is an application for permission to withdraw.

2. Arguments concluded.

3. Judgment reserved. (NIRMALA NEGI) (NIKITA SINGH) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead